Professionalism and integrity in researchCourses for beginning PhD candidates
Number of sessions: 1
Hours of session: 6
Entry level: Introduction
May 1 (Tuesday) 2018
09.15 - 15.15
Sanders building (directions) room 0-12
Academic researchers are frequently faced with dilemmas: Can I exclude particular observations from my research? Can I use exactly the same data set for multiple papers? Should I agree on a colleague being a co-author on a paper to which he/she has not made a significant contribution?
To help junior researchers address these issues, this workshop will seek to raise awareness for, and where necessary help increase, scientific professionalism and integrity.
Aims and working method
During the first part of the workshop, the instructor and junior researchers will, in two highly interactive lectures, discuss the context of the principles, values and rules as they apply to the fields of the social sciences and the humanities research in general, and to our university in particular.
The afternoon section is reserved for the EUR Dilemma Game, which includes in-depth discussions in smaller groups on particular dilemmas. Through the game researchers are invited to exchange opinions and experiences, and defend (and possibly reconsider) alternative courses of action regarding realistic dilemmas on professionalism and integrity in research.
The 75 dilemmas included in the game have been collected through sessions at different EUR departments and institutions, and among researchers that use different research strategies and are in different stages of their careers.
EUR declaration of scientific integrity
According to the Erasmus University Doctoral Regulations, all academic employees and PhD candidates of Erasmus need to sign an integrity code through which they vow to comply with the principles described in The Netherlands Code of Conduct for Academic Practice (pdf). The academic integrity declaration will be signed by all participants at the end of the workshop.
- The workshop aims to support PhD candidates in further developing and honing their 'moral compass'.
- This is achieved by exposing them to academic dilemmas in the context of small group discussions and through the sharing of experiences from their own research environment.
How to prepare
In order to actively participate, participants are required to read the following literature:
- EUR code of scientific integrity
- EUR webpage on scientific integrity
- VSNU, 'The Netherlands Code of Conduct for Academic Practice' (2004, Revised 2014)
- The National Academy Press 'On being a scientist: a guide to responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.)
- Martinson, Anderson and de Vries, 'Scientists behaving badly', Nature 435 (2005)
- Albert and Wager, 'How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers', The COPE report (2003)
- Stroebe, Postmes and Spears, 'Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science', Perspectives on Psychological Science', 7 (2012).
09.15-09.30 welcome and introduction
09.30-10.30 interactive lecture 1
10.30-10.45 coffee and tea break
10.45-12.00 sharing experiences from one's own research environment
12.00-12.30 discussion on prevention: what, how, where?
12.30-13.15 lunch break
13.15-14.45 EUR Dilemma Game: exploring and discussing dilemmas in small groups
14.45-15.00 EUR declaration of scientific integrity: Q&A and signing
About the instructor
Suzanna (Sanne) Opree is an Assistant Professor of Quantitative Research Methods in the Department of Media and Communication at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Suzanna has published refereed articles in journals such as Communication Research, Media Psychology, and Pediatrics. Her work has been recognized with best paper awards at the 2012 Child and Teen Consumption (CTC) and the 2014 and 2016 International Communication Association (ICA) conferences. She is also the recipient of the 2015 Baschwitz Young Scholar Award. Suzanna's teaching interests include quantitative research methods, global advertising, and consumer culture theory.